Home » SAME SILICONE MOLD. DIFFERENT JOB TO DO
Urethane casting vs. vacuum casting — how Amorphous produces 10 to 100 production-grade parts without ever cutting a steel mold, and which one actually fits your part.
Urethane casting and vacuum casting get used almost interchangeably, and honestly, they overlap more than they don’t — both pour two-part polyurethane resin into a silicone mold instead of a machined steel one. Amorphous runs urethane casting and vacuum casting as two angles on the same family of process, not two unrelated services.
The real difference is what each is optimized to prove. Amorphous leans on urethane casting when a part needs to perform and feel like the end material — rubber-like flexibility, optical clarity, production-grade strength. Vacuum casting gets the call when the part’s geometry is the hard part — thin walls, overhangs, threads, and internal features that need to fill completely without trapping a single air bubble.

Both processes at Amorphous follow the same backbone — only the casting step itself changes.
Amorphous picks between them based on what the part has to prove first — material behavior, or geometric precision.
Urethane resins can mimic ABS, PP, rubber, or optical-grade clarity — closer to a real production material than any 3D print. Amorphous reaches for urethane casting on dashboards, seals, gaskets, and enclosures where a client needs to test how the part actually feels and performs, not just how it looks.
Thin walls, threads, overhangs, and internal features all rely on the resin reaching every corner of the mold before it cures. Amorphous uses vacuum casting specifically to pull resin into those hard-to-reach details with high repeatability, on parts like connector housings where a missed corner means a rejected part.
A part with fine detail and a demanding material spec doesn’t force a choice. Amorphous often pours under vacuum with a urethane resin selected for its end-use properties — the two aren’t competing options so much as dials on the same process.
Amorphous places casting between two more familiar processes, and picks based on volume and how close the part needs to be to final production intent.
Amorphous runs low-volume casting across a wide industry spread — browse the Projects gallery — usually wherever a client needs real parts in hand before committing to tooling.
Committing to a steel mold before a design is fully validated is one of the most expensive mistakes in product development — a late change means recutting tooling, not editing a CAD file. Amorphous uses casting as the checkpoint between Digital Prototyping and mass production, where a client gets real, production-grade parts in hand to test before that decision is locked in.
It also buys time. Amorphous can turn a silicone mold around fast enough to support a product launch or a funding milestone that a multi-week steel tooling cycle simply can’t hit, all while the Design stays open to changes based on what the cast parts reveal.
Typically 15 to 25 castings before quality starts to drift, depending on part complexity. Amorphous can cut a fresh mold from the same master if a project needs more.
Yes — Amorphous can pigment resin to match a target color and finish, and mold in surface texture directly from the master pattern.
Not really — Amorphous scopes the part first and usually combines both: a urethane resin chosen for material properties, poured under vacuum for geometric accuracy.
Once volume climbs past roughly 100 units, or the project timeline supports tooling lead time. Amorphous walks clients through that threshold as part of our full Services engagement, rather than defaulting to one process by habit.
Amorphous runs urethane and vacuum casting alongside design, simulation, and production — one team, one model, no handoffs.
Talk to Amorphous — amorphousindia.com/contact